Build a card-by-card manifest, enter one current service tier for each company, and compare the order math without treating price as a quality ranking.
Every published price and service rule should be verified before a submission is created.
A useful comparison also considers card eligibility, minimum quantities, declared-value rules, turnaround, reporting, holder preference, vault workflow, and where the collector expects to keep or sell the card.
Estimated totals use only the figures entered above. They are sorted by total cost, not company quality.
Enter the current service terms for PSA, CGC, Arena Club, Advanced Grading, SGC, and TAG, then choose Compare the six routes.
Every estimate is a worksheet, not a price feed or grading recommendation.
Grading prices, service availability, card limits, memberships, and promotions can change. The planner asks the collector to enter a current service tier from the linked official source instead of presenting an old fee as today's price.
No. The results compare visitor-entered cost assumptions only. Authentication approach, card eligibility, reporting, holder preference, turnaround, vault workflow, collector familiarity, and selling plans can matter too.
When a maximum is entered, the planner excludes card quantities above that amount from the service calculation. When it is left blank, the planner labels declared-value eligibility as unchecked.
The planner always includes PSA, CGC, Arena Club, Advanced Grading, SGC, and TAG. Every company has an official pricing link and a separate Card Collector Capital company guide.
Move from card identity to likely costs, then compare the companies that fit the submission.